This is extralegal and extrajudicial: no declaration of war, no clear congressional or UN authorization, no due process. Unilateral seizure of a foreign head of state shreds sovereignty and international law.

Maduro and wife captured by Delta www.washingtonpost.com/world/202…


NPR is the anti Trump station

Turned on WAMU/NPR this morning and every single segment is anti Trump. 100%. Amazing. One just came on now: “Trump sent Biden death penalty inmates to supermax.” NPR is Anti-Trump News. Makes sense but even bad press is good press as long as you spell his name right. I’ve listened to WAMU since 1993 and this is unprecedented (unpresidented).


°🥂⋆.ೃ🍾࿔*:・

°🥂⋆.ೃ🍾࿔*:・


MAGA is META

A lot of people are still arguing about MAGA as if it’s a permanent identity or a unified ideology. That framing misses what actually made it function.

MAGA, at its peak, wasn’t a coherent movement. It was a temporary populist coalition built on overlapping grievances, not shared values. People aligned not because they agreed with each other, but because they shared enemies: political elites, cultural institutions, economic gatekeepers, and a sense of exclusion from decision-making. “The enemy of my enemy is my friend” isn’t philosophy; it’s coalition math.

That’s why fixating on red hats or the slogan “Make America Great Again” leads people astray. Those symbols represent a loud minority, not the full alignment that made MAGA electorally viable. The most important participants were often the least visible: disaffected labor voters, civil libertarians, anti-war voters, small business owners, institutional skeptics, and even left-leaning voters alienated by Democratic leadership. Many never identified as “MAGA” at all.

Populist coalitions are inherently fragile. They work only as long as the alliance remains flexible and grievance-focused. The moment they harden into a fixed identity, purity test, or ideological project, they start shedding members. That’s what we’re seeing now.

The right is actively redefining itself, and not subtly. America First is not a rebrand of MAGA; it’s a narrower, explicitly right-wing, reactionary ideology. Figures like Nick Fuentes don’t represent continuity, they represent capture. When populism collapses into ethnonationalism or rigid identity politics, it stops being a coalition and becomes a faction.

This is also why both parties keep misreading voters. Democrats fight symbols instead of addressing grievances. Republicans mistake the loudest faction for the whole base. Meanwhile, the large middle keeps drifting, defecting, or disengaging.

MAGA wasn’t a permanent movement. It was a temporary alignment of interests. Confusing coalition dynamics with identity fandom is how people misunderstand what happened, and why it won’t repeat in the same form.


TV reminder: couches, drywall, car doors, desks, kitchen islands, mattresses, bookshelves, and flipped tables do not stop bullets. That’s concealment, not cover. It hides you from eyes, not physics. Movies lie. Ballistics don’t.


I wonder if being a featured interviewee in The Age of Disclosure documentary about UFOs and aliens will help or hurt Marco Rubio’s future bid as President of the United States. What say you?


Such a lovely little film. Still missing the lovely actress Michelle Trachtenberg. Rest in peace lovely lady.


The Kennedy Center mostly serves wealthy donors, elites, and people with money to burn. If we’re constantly told to hate the rich and stop catering to them, why is anyone upset that an institution built around elite cultural pampering is disrupted? newrepublic.com/post/2048…


Best. Movie. Ever. (I keep forgetting)


Whenever I see anything about “the performative liberal male” I can’t help but my mind always returns to this classic SNL skit: www.youtube.com/watch


WOD: Boffo: (of a theatrical production or movie, or a review of one) very successful or wholeheartedly commendatory—I knew the word but I didn’t know the actual definition. The more you know.


There is a meaningful distinction between rare, targeted state violence against elite political dissidents and the routine criminalization of ordinary speech.

High-level dissidents such as exiled officials, influential journalists, or opposition organizers operate within power struggles that states treat as existential threats.

Violence against them, while indefensible, is exceptional rather than systemic.

By contrast, arresting everyday citizens for online speech represents a different and arguably more corrosive form of repression.

When speech laws are enforced broadly and bureaucratically, they reshape social behavior at scale. Ordinary people begin to self-censor not because they challenge power, but because enforcement is ambient, unpredictable, and normalized.

The existence of extreme cases of repression elsewhere does not justify expanding speech policing in liberal societies. Nor does elite political violence serve as a useful benchmark for evaluating domestic speech restrictions.

The danger lies less in rare acts of spectacular repression than in systems that quietly criminalize expression for everyone.


Dems: here’s a cheat code to win ‘26 & ‘28

How liberals paved the way for Trump youtube.com/watch


Antifa and similar street movements don’t work like clubs you join. They work like Hollywood. A script appears, money shows up, logistics lock in, and suddenly there’s a production. You don’t enlist. You get cast. Think less membership card, more SAG

Antifa and similar emergent street forces are misunderstood because people keep asking the wrong question: “Is it an organization you can join?” That’s like asking whether Hollywood is a club with membership forms.

It isn’t.

These movements function like movie production. First comes a script. A narrative of moral urgency, crisis, or resistance. Then comes funding, whether direct or indirect, legal support, transport, bail funds, media amplification, or institutional tolerance. Once the project is fully financed and the conditions are right, the cast assembles.

No one fills out an application. No one gets a membership card. People self-select into roles once the production exists. Some are repeat actors. Some are day players. Some just show up for one shoot and disappear. That doesn’t make the production imaginary. It makes it episodic.

Leadership in this model is not a chairman or a general. It’s whoever greenlights the project, controls resources, absorbs risk, and signals when and where to show up. That’s how coherence emerges without hierarchy. That’s how everyone involved maintains plausible deniability afterward.

This is why arguments like “there is no organized Antifa” are technically true and practically evasive. There may be no standing army, but there are recurring productions with familiar crews, tactics, and narratives. Violence and disorder are not commanded. They are incentivized, enabled, and later disowned.

So no, Antifa isn’t a club you join. It’s closer to getting your SAG card. Once the movie is funded, the extras always find the set.


Here’s a first edition of my spy novel!

Hill Mole: Life is But a Dream a.co/d/9cbMJB8


Here’s a first edition of my spy novel!

Hill Mole: Life is But a Dream a.co/d/9cbMJB8


Leaving a Purple Meshtastic Node in the Window How a $55 LoRa device stopped being a gadget and became infrastructure chrisabraham.substack.com/p/leaving…


Underinvested Commodities, Overhyped AI: Reading 2026 the Austrian Way

pca.st/episode/8…


Delicious NPR J6 propaganda—yum yum!

Not a peaceful protest pca.st/episode/a…


My Meshtastic Journey—So Far So Good chrisabraham.com/blog/my-m…