Kvetching is usually a sign that the basics are handled. The lights are on. Food is available. The streets mostly work. Institutions are imperfect but functional enough to be criticized. People feel safe enough to demand better. In that sense, complaint is not always decadence. It is often a symptom of stability.

A society in real collapse does not spend all day arguing about tone, process, fairness, or whether a system feels alienating. People in collapse improvise, endure, flee, barter, hide, repair, and survive. They are busy with first-order problems. Complaint, especially organized public complaint, usually shows that a culture has enough surplus to move beyond mere survival and start fighting over quality, standards, and the last 20%.

That is why constant criticism can be annoying and still be healthy. It often means people expect things to work and believe they can be improved. It means they have not given up. It means there is enough social trust left to assume that speaking up might matter. Even protest, in many cases, depends on a functioning system beneath it. You need roads to march on, platforms to post on, and enough institutional restraint to believe dissent will not automatically get you disappeared.

The danger is not the complaining itself. The danger starts when a culture loses perspective. When discomfort gets confused with catastrophe. When inconvenience gets framed as oppression. When every flaw becomes proof that the whole civilization is illegitimate. That is where healthy criticism can curdle into moral panic.

And that is the trap. The last 20% is the hardest part. It is one thing to build order, abundance, and relative peace. It is another thing entirely to perfect them. A stable society can improve for generations and still never become utopia. If people forget that, they start demanding impossible outcomes at impossible speed. Frustration rises. Patience collapses. Then the temptation arrives: force, purity, control, a strong hand to “fix it.”

So yes, only healthy cultures complain, and that is often a good sign. It means the culture is alive enough to argue with itself. The task is not to silence the kvetching. The task is to keep perspective while doing it, so reform stays reform and does not mutate into hysteria, purity politics, or authoritarianism.